SPI 352/COS 352: Artificial Intelligence, Law, & Public Policy

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, FALL 2024
Location: Robertson Hall 016
Time: Thursdays 1:30pm-3:20pm
Instructor

Prof. Peter Henderson, J.D., Ph.D.

Assistant Professor in CS/SPIA

Preceptor

Christian Chung

PhD Candidate SPIA

Course Description

This course examines the implications of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly foundation models, for law and public policy. We will cover how AI affects and reshapes legal doctrine and policy, including: intellectual property law, administrative law, anti-discrimination law, and more. Also covered will be emerging regulatory policies and legislative efforts around AI, as well as the limits of proposed approaches. Emphasis will be placed juxtaposing the legal and policy considerations with technical design decisions, in an interdisciplinary and accessible way. This course is suitable for students of all backgrounds; no technical knowledge is assumed.

Course Expectations & Grading

Components

  • 📝 Reading Responses (25%): Due 5pm ET the day before class on Canvas
  • 👥 Participation (20%): Attending lectures and precepts
  • đź“„ Final Paper/Project (55%):
    • Literature Review & Project Proposal - October 18th (10%)
    • First Draft - November 25th (15%)
    • Final Draft - December 13th (30%)

Course Schedule

DATE TOPIC LECTURE AGENDA
9/5 Preliminaries: What is AI?

What kinds of AI do you immediately think of when you think "AI regulation?" Do a search on the web, what is your preferred definition of AI, and why? Do you think we even need to define AI in regulatory efforts at all, why or why not?

Required Readings:

No required reading for first day of class.

Optional Readings:
  • Matt O'Shaughnessy, One of the Biggest Problems in Regulating AI Is Agreeing on a Definition, Carnegie Endowment For Int'l Peace (Oct. 6, 2022) [link]
  • Rishi Bommasani et al., On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models, arXiv (July 12, 2022) [link]
  • Orin S. Kerr, How to Read a Legal Opinion: A Guide for New Law Students, 11 Green Bag 2d 51 (2007) [pdf]
  • Sayash Kapoor et al., Position: On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models, in Proceedings of the 41st Int'l Conference on Machine Learning 23082 (2024) [link]
9/12 Intellectual Property I: Copyright

Should model training be a fair use? What if the model outputs exact pieces of the training data? How much verbatim regurgitation by models should be acceptable? Do you think the courts should resolve this or should Congress step in, why or why not? Should humans have authorship rights in AI-generated content purely from prompting?

Required Readings:
  • Katherine Lee et al., Talkin' 'Bout AI Generation: Copyright and the Generative-AI Supply Chain (The Short Version), in Proc. of the Symp. on Comput. Sci. & L. 48 (2024) [pdf]
  • Complaint, N.Y. Times Co. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 1:23-cv-11195 (S.D.N.Y. filed Dec. 27, 2023) [pdf] (skim)
  • Complaint, Concord Music Grp., Inc. v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:23-cv-01092 (M.D. Tenn. filed Oct. 18, 2023) [pdf] (skim)
  • Carys J. Craig, The AI-Copyright Trap, 100 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. (forthcoming 2025) [link] (skim only pages 18-26)
Optional Readings:
  • Benjamin L.W. Sobel, Artificial Intelligence's Fair Use Crisis, 41 Colum. J.L. & Arts 45 (2017)
  • Peter Henderson et al., Foundation Models and Fair Use, 24 J. Machine Learning Rsch. 1 (2023)
  • U.S. Copyright Off., Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence, 88 Fed. Reg. 16190 (Mar. 16, 2023)
9/19 Intellectual Property II: Right of Publicity + Privacy I

How do you think we should regulate use of likeness? What does it mean for a voice clone or character to be too close in likeness to a real person? What if multiple people have similar voices? Should restrictions on use of likeness expire ever? What about elected officials, should we be more or less restrictive about use of their likeness?

Required Readings:
  • Right of Publicity, Legal Info. Inst. [link]
  • Midler v. Ford Motor Co., 849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir. 1988) [link]
  • Colin Stutz, The Fake Drake AI Song Earned Millions of Streams – But Will Anyone Get Paid?, Billboard (May 25, 2023) [link]
  • Complaint, Vacker v. Eleven Labs, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00987-UNA (D. Del. filed Aug. 29, 2024) [pdf]
  • Bobby Allyn, Scarlett Johansson says she is 'shocked, angered' over new ChatGPT voice, NPR (May 20, 2024) [link]
  • Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. 14/1 et seq. [link]
Optional Readings:
  • Assemb. 1488, 221st Leg., 2024-2025 Sess. (N.J. 2024), [link]
  • Assemb. 1836 (CA 2024), [link]
  • S. 4569, 118th Cong. (2024) (TAKE IT DOWN Act), [link]
  • Jennifer King & Caroline Meinhardt, Rethinking Privacy in the AI Era: Policy Provocations for a Data-Centric World 1 (2024), [link]
  • MarĂ­a P. Angel and Ryan Calo, Distinguishing Privacy Law: A Critique of Privacy as Social Taxonomy, 124 Colum. L. Rev. 507 (2024), [link]
  • Alicia Solow-Niederman, Information Privacy and the Inference Economy, 117 NW. U. L. Rev. 357, 382–84 (2022) [link]
9/26 Tort Liability & Section 230

Should large language models be immune from liability under Section 230? What about recommendation systems? Where should we draw the line? What is considered reasonable care under a negligence standard in tort law?

Required Readings:
  • Ketan Ramakrishnan et al., U.S. Tort Liability for Large-Scale Artificial Intelligence Damages: A Primer for Developers and Policymakers, RAND Corp. (Aug. 21, 2024) [link]
  • Peter Henderson et al., Where's the Liability in Harmful AI Speech?, 3 J. Free Speech L. 589 (2023) [pdf] (only pages 620-626 after skimming 602-620)
  • Winter v. G.P. Putnam's Sons, 938 F.2d 1033 (9th Cir. 1991) [link]
  • Anderson v. TikTok, Inc., 2024 WL 3948248 (3d Cir. Aug. 27, 2024)
  • Eric Goldman, Bonkers Opinion Repeals Section 230 In the Third Circuit–Anderson v. TikTok, Tech. & Mktg. L. Blog (Aug. 29, 2024) [link]
10/3 Free Speech and First Amendment

As the conflicting readings suggest, there is significant grey area around the applicability of the First Amendment, what do you think the right position is? What makes you think this is the right position and how do you assess the "correctness" of your position? What are the consequences of taking one position of the other?

Required Readings:
  • NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta, No. 23-2969 (9th Cir. Aug. 16, 2024)
  • Eugene Volokh et al., Freedom of Speech and AI Output, 3 J. Free Speech L. 651 (2023)
  • Peter Salib, AI Outputs Are Not Protected Speech, 100 Wash. U. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2024) (skim)
Optional Readings:
  • Patrick Zurth, The German NetzDG as Role Model or Cautionary Tale? Implications for the Debate on Social Media Liability, 31 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1084 (2020)
  • Toni M. Massaro & Helen Norton, Siri-ously? Free Speech Rights and Artificial Intelligence, 110 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1169 (2016) (skim)
10/10 National Security Threats & Uses, Export Controls, & The Executive's Power

What are the pros and cons of a distributed state-level approach to AI regulation versus an approach relying on executive powers? What about comparing a pre-clearance regime to a post-deployment monitoring regime? How should we balance expanding national security powers around AI against containing the risks of AI? How does the first amendment interact with executive powers?

Required Readings:
  • Exec. Order No. 14,110, Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (2023) [link]
  • Exec. Order No. 14,117, Preventing Access to Americans' Bulk Sensitive Data and United States Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern [link]
  • Faiza Patel & Patrick C. Toomey, National Security Carve-Outs Undermine AI Regulations, Just Security (Dec. 21, 2023) [link]
  • Kat Duffy & Kyle Fendorf, In the Age of AI, Personal Data Security Is National Security, Council on Foreign Relations (Apr. 1, 2024) [link]
Optional Readings:
  • Christopher A. Mouton et al., The Operational Risks of AI in Large-Scale Biological Attacks Results of a Red-Team Study, RAND (Jan. 25, 2024) (skim) [link]
  • National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence Report [link]
10/17 Fall Break
10/24 The Administrative State I: Antidiscrimination Law

What is your assessment of the complications of determining whether Facebook / Meta violated the Fair Housing Act? Do you agree with the resolution of the case? Do you think WorkDay should be liable for discrimination or should it be a problem only for direct employers? What if we go further upstream to OpenAI and other foundation model providers if they power WorkDay's service?

Required Readings:
  • Solon Barocas & Andrew D. Selbst, Big Data's Disparate Impact, 104 Calif. L. Rev. 671 (2016)
  • Complaint, United States v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-05187 (S.D.N.Y. 2022) [pdf]
  • Settlement Agreement, United States v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-05187 (S.D.N.Y. 2022) [pdf]
  • Mobley v. Workday, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-00770-RFL (N.D. Cal. July 12, 2024) [pdf]
  • U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, and Disability Discrimination in Hiring (2022) [link]
10/31 The Administrative State II: Antitrust and Labor

What tools can we leverage to constrain concentration of power under increased automation? What role should different areas of law play in this? Should we battle concentration of power at all? Do you think labor organizing will be effective for this? What about antitrust law?

Required Readings:
  • Cynthia Estlund, What Should We Do After Work? Automation and Employment Law, 128 Yale L.J. 254 (2018)
  • Lina M. Khan, Amazon's Antitrust Paradox, 126 Yale L.J. 710 (2016)
  • United States v. RealPage [pdf]
  • SAG-AFTRA and Replica Studios Introduce Groundbreaking AI Voice Agreement at CES [link]
11/7 The Administrative State III: Challenges for Regulators in the Administrative State

Do you think the administrative state remains a viable option after recent supreme court jurisprudence? Is regulation better off in the hands of the states, or the executive?

Required Readings:
  • Amy Howe, Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies [link]
  • US Supreme Court's October 2023 Term: Administrative Law Trilogy – Holdings, Analyses, and Implications of Jarkesy, Loper Bright, and Corner Post, Cooley LLP (July 26, 2024) [link]
  • Meta Platforms v. Federal Trade Commission [pdf]
  • Kate Andrias, Amazon, SpaceX and Other Companies Are Arguing the Government Agency That Has Protected Labor Rights Since 1935 Is Actually Unconstitutional [link]
11/14 The Administrative State IV: Uses in the Administrative States and Constraints on Itself

Does it matter if a human is in the loop? If so, when and how can we make sure that humans are actually doing their job when they're in the loop? If not, why not? Are there government uses of AI that you're more or less comfortable with?

Required Readings:
  • Cary Coglianese & David Lehr, Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era, 105 Geo. L.J. 1147 (2017)
  • Ryan Calo & Danielle Keats Citron, The Automated Administrative State: A Crisis of Legitimacy, 70 Emory L.J. 797 (2021)
  • Shirin Sinnar, Courts Have Been Hiding Behind National Security for Too Long, Brennan Center For Justice (Aug. 11, 2021) [link]
  • Government by Algorithm Report, Admin. Conf. of the U.S. [pdf]
Optional Readings:
  • Peter Henderson & Mark Krass, Algorithmic Rulemaking vs. Algorithmic Guidance, 37 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 1 (2023).
  • Danielle Keats Citron, Technological Due Process, 85 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1249, 1251-58, 1305-1313 (2008).
11/21 Project Discussions
11/28 Thanksgiving Recess
12/5 Global Approaches and Comparing Regulatory Methods: EU AI Act, Regulatory Efforts in China, International Agreements

How do the different regulatory approaches compare? Which one do you think is better and why?

Required Readings:
  • Margot E. Kaminski, Regulating the Risks of AI, 103 B.U. L. Rev. 1347 (2023)
  • Matt Sheehan, Tracing the Roots of China's AI Regulations, Carnegie Endowment for Int'l Peace (Feb. 27, 2024) [link]
  • Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy, U.S. State Department Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability (Nov. 9, 2023) [link]
  • Emma Klein & Stewart Patrick, Envisioning a Global Regime Complex to Govern Artificial Intelligence, Carnegie Endowment for Int'l Peace (Mar. 21, 2024) [link]